پس با این حساب حالا که اوبونتویی که نصب کردم 32 بیتی باید بی خیالش شم برم یه 64 بیتی شو نصب کنم تا از حداکثر توانایی سیستمم استفاده کنم یا اصلا ربطی نداره به این چیزا
ربط داره.
اگه میخوای از حداکثر قدرت سی پی یوت استفاده کنی: 64
اگه میخوای از حداکثر قدرت پشتیبانی کدهای 32بیتی استفاده کنی: 32
-----------------------------------------
http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2007/11/26/32bit-vs-64bi...
Recently I’ve seen a good bit of discussion regarding 32bit vs 64bit
installations of Ubuntu. We’ve even had long conversations at the office on the
matter as well. For a long time I’ve simply installed 32bit on my Core2Duo
machine, even though it supports the 64bit installation. I just didn’t see a lot
of reason to make the step forward. Well, I thought I’d type up some of my
thoughts on the matter and get some of the community thoughts...
32bit Ubuntu
The 32bit Ubuntu definitely get’s the most attention as it applies to the wider
user base. There are more packages available for 32bit than there are for
64bit, but that gap is quickly closing. 32bit seems to run well enough on most
machines, and a lot of people don’t really see the point for desktop use. I do
hear a lot of arguments for 64bit on a server, but for a desktop most people
just look the other way.
64bit Ubuntu
The 64bit Ubuntu install base seems to be slowly growing. I am one of the
recent “converts” to 64bit Ubuntu. While I don’t immediately see any
performance benefit I do see some benefit on principle. In the same way that
more attention to an application improves the application, more attention to
64bit improves that platform as well. Basically, I think I’m in the 64bit camp
right now simply because I believe it’ll never get “awesome” if nobody uses it,
reports issues and resolves those issues.
So far I have not had any show stoppers with my 64bit installation. Everything
seems to work the same way it did with 32bit. Again, I don’t think I see much
of a performance increase, but on the principle of improving the platform I’ll
continue to run it. Issues that were previous show stoppers such as flash not
being available are now resolved. While Adobe still does not have a 64bit native
flashplayer, Ubuntu 7.10 will auto-wrap the 32bit player for you in 64bit when
it is needed for installation. So far I have not run into any missing packages for
64bit, although I’m sure they are out there someplace. Perhaps the more users
we got on the 64bit platform the more quickly we’ll find the missing packages.
Also, if you have 4G of RAM or more you’ll want the 64bit as it handles that
amount of memory better.
I suppose in the end it’ll come down to what the user is the most comfortable
with but, again, if you’re already comfortable with potential issues with
Ubuntu and feel like you can help improve the platform, why not run 64bit
Ubuntu? It’ll only get better if you help us make it better..
Any other thoughts from the community on the topic? Any concerns you’ve
run into? Any other pros and cons you might outline? The comment box is
down ’bout two inches
[left/]